Ethan Quinn vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
E. Quinn vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

Ethan Quinn

USA

0

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

C. Rank

149

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$793.9K

Career Money

$539.0K

Plays

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

0

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

C. Rank

149

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$793.9K

Career Money

$539.0K

Plays

Head-to-head: Quinn 0 - 2 Wong

They have played 4 sets in total, with Ethan Quinn winning 0 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 4. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ethan Quinn was at the Lincoln Challenger, 06-08-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Quinn	0
Wong	2

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1) Lincoln Challenger(08-06-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Ethan Quinn

(QF) Tyler Challenger(06-07-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Ethan Quinn

E. Quinn vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile

E. Quinn	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
$793,915	Career Prize Money	$538,970
57.89% (132-96)	Career Total W/L	55.78% (164-130)
0	Hard	2
4	Titles	2
0	Total H2H Matches	2
40.00% (12-18)	YTD Win/Loss	45.45% (5-6)

E. Quinn vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ethan Quinn has won 50.17% of points on their second serve, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ethan Quinn, in recent form, has won 44.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 44.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.75% and 22.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Ethan Quinn has saved 56.28% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 51.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Ethan Quinn has won 61.11% of matches played (W/L 44/28), with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 51.61% (W/L 32/30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Ethan Quinn has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 31/20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 19/17). Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8).
Player level: In the last year, Ethan Quinn has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/12), where as Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ethan Quinn winning 0 times and Chak Lam Coleman Wong being victorious 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Ethan Quinn winning 0 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 4.
The last match between Ethan Quinn and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Lincoln Challenger, 06-08-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:42.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ethan Quinn has played against opponents with an average rank of 141.85 while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against players with an average rank of 204.77.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ethan Quinn has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Ethan Quinn has converted 29.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Ethan Quinn vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Quinn vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

E. Quinn	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
0	H2H Matches Won	2
0	Sets Won	4
8	Games Won	24
2	Aces (Total)	16
7	Total Double Faults	3
1:17:42	Average Match Time	1:17:42
54% (65/120)	1st Serve %	63% (68/108)
60% (39/65)	1st Serve Win %	76% (52/68)
44% (24/55)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (20/40)
0% (0/4)	Break Pts Won %	42% (8/19)
33% (36/108)	Return Points Win %	48% (57/120)
0% (0/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

E. Quinn Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025
R1 Karen KhachanovK. Khachanov	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Q3 Botic Van De ZandschulpB. Van	W	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
Q1 Ugo BlanchetU. Blanchet	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Erste Bank Open - Vienna - 20-10-2025
Q3 Damir DzumhurD. Dzumhur	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Q1 Vit KoprivaV. Kopriva	W	4-6 6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

E. Quinn vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

E. Quinn	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
57.89% (132/96)	YTD Win/Loss	55.78% (164/130)
54.74% (300/248)	Sets Win/Loss	54.07% (372/316)
51.61% (2811/2636)	Games Win/Loss	51.16% (3419/3264)
58.46% (76/54)	Hard Win/Loss	58.90% (129/90)
52.78% (19/17)	Clay Win/Loss	46.51% (20/23)
60.78% (31/20)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (9/9)
54.55% (6/5)	Grass Win/Loss	42.86% (6/8)
0.45	Aces Per Game	0.52
1198	Aces Total	1687
0.24	Double Faults Per Game	0.18
651	Total Double Faults	603
1:48:18	Average Match Time	1:31:40
325.33	Average Opponent Rank	369.61
60% (10162/16932)	1st Serve %	60% (11331/18739)
71% (7236/10162)	1st Serve Win %	71% (8054/11331)
51% (3433/6770)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (3631/7408)
40% (598/1496)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (703/1718)
38% (6402/16834)	Return Points Win %	38% (7230/18830)
56.25% (9/7)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
59.09% (13/9)	Masters W/L	46.67% (7/8)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	62.50% (5/3)
48.72% (19/20)	Main Tour W/L	27.27% (3/8)
54.84% (51/42)	Challenger W/L	55.65% (69/55)
68.97% (40/18)	Futures W/L	59.50% (72/49)
58% (128/219)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (157/286)
43% (3/7)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	83% (5/6)
59% (55/94)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	55% (56/102)
59% (49/83)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (51/94)
86% (125/107)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (157/136)
14% (125/18)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (157/21)
23% (103/24)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (137/27)